There’s not a lot of “big news” that sweeps the experience design world, but there was last week. It felt like something I wanted to share as an uncharacteristic short blog post instead of a wall-of-text essay.
I’ve been a fan of the Adaptive Path people for a long time. I remember pushing the @jjg visual vocabulary on people back in like 2003, which in internet years is a lifetime ago. I’ve gone to their conferences, read the blogs, bought in to the mindset. And I’ve got the surreal opportunity to even talk at an event of theirs this November.
Out on the web, I’ve seen a surprisingly low amount of talk about the inevitable “sellout” take. I get it. A mega-bank buying up what was essentially a defining voice of UX and experience design for a whole decade. It doesn’t make sense, does it? Banks aren’t know for their reputation to try and provide great experiences and endear people.
But Adaptive Path is.
Is Capital One wanting to push the limits of what an organization like that can do? Maybe be one of the first places of that nature to really go after the extremely high bar of being the “Apple of personal finance?” A company that will come to be loved and actually provide experiences in a way that no pound-for-pound competitors seem to be even trying? At some point, there was going to be a company you’d never guess join the experience-matters revolution. Someone had to eventually pull their corporate head of of their ass and actually try and do it right.
Well, as I look down at my wallet and see the bright white, shining Simple debit card that I love, it makes me wonder. Simple is a banking service, a no-hassle debit card and checking account. What’s to love? Well… everything. Or my Square reader and the (future TBD) Square wallet? Or Apple Pay? A computer company getting into mobile payments? What?
That’s the way of the world now. Any company that is willing to commit to labor and toil of providing awesome, endearing experiences can do so. And I think having Dan Makoski as the VP of Design at Capital One (I bet you didn’t know he joined the company earlier this year) was their first step into deciding that to really go where companies want to go, you have to invest in experience and design. This argument has already been decided, there’s nothing else to debate.
If you accept that it makes sense that a company with 25 billion dollars in revenue wants to go where very few companies of their nature have dared go before, it makes perfect sense to have Adaptive Path join. And to acquire such a pivotal, game changing company of the early 20th century, I have to believe it is as legit as @jjg says here.
There’s no other explanation that makes sense. It’s either a strange exit and (huge) cashout for the owners of Adaptive Path right during their peak and the growing frenzy around service design, or it’s exactly what it appears on the surface: a big bank wanted to pivot and go places no company like theirs has gone, or appears to be even trying to go, and they enrolled one of the top sources of experience design and strategy in the same idea. It seems like Capital One can have no better chance at succeeding.
There just isn’t any point for them to acquire and extinguish a UX agency. They wanted the best, they got the best. And with AP’s focus on service design and the endless amount of services that Capital One can optimize and create, it would be an endless scope of work with unfathomable reach into an existing and new customer base. Imagine the possibilities – buying an entire experience agency to be the service design division of your gargantuan company.
So, having said all that, I’m going on record here saying I buy it. It’s exactly as it appears, and likely will be a pivotal moment in experience design and an extremely interesting case of 2 companies doing something very different that others of their nature…